Vladislav SolovevPartner & Head of Research

November 6, 2026 · 6 min read

ROFO vs ROFR: Key Differences Explained

Two rights that give someone first claim on shares, office space or property. Who sets the price, who each side favors and what to check.

  • Cap tables & term sheets
1.0The short answer

ROFR vs ROFO comes down to who names the price first. Under a right of first offer (ROFO), the owner must offer the asset to the right holder before anyone else, on terms the owner sets. Under a right of first refusal (ROFR), the owner finds a buyer first and the right holder can match that deal. A ROFO favors the owner. A ROFR favors the right holder.

You meet both rights in two places. If you own shares in a private company, a ROFR usually stands between you and any buyer. If you rent office or retail space, your lease may give you a ROFO or a ROFR on space next door.

10 days

Business days CRA International has to accept its landlord’s offer of extra floors

08.01.2024 · CRA lease amendment

95%

If the landlord rents for less than this share of its offered terms, it must offer the space again

08.01.2024 · CRA lease amendment

30 days

Astera Labs’ window to match a sale of an employee’s vested shares

2024 · Astera Labs equity plan, Form S-1/A

15 + 10 days

Time for the company, then its investors, to use a ROFR in the NVCA model

April 2026 · NVCA model agreement

2.0Side by side

What Is the Difference Between a ROFO and a ROFR?

The table compares the two on what each is, who sets the price, who uses it, legal and tax treatment, the main risk, the effect on liquidity and a typical example. Both give one party the first chance to buy or rent. They differ on whether the market has spoken yet.

What it is
Right of first offer (ROFO)The owner must offer the asset to the right holder first, on terms the owner proposes.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)The right holder can buy or lease on the same terms an outside party has offered.
When it starts
Right of first offer (ROFO)When the owner decides to sell or lease, before going to the market.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)After the owner has a deal with an outside party.
Who sets the price
Right of first offer (ROFO)The owner. The holder accepts or declines.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)The outside party. The holder can only match.
Who uses it
Right of first offer (ROFO)Tenants seeking room to grow, co-owners, business partners.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)Private companies over employee and founder shares. Tenants and neighbors over property.
Legal and tax treatment
Right of first offer (ROFO)A contract term. For Delaware shares, it must be noted on the certificate. It creates no tax event.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)Same rules. A permanent ROFR at a formula price can affect how stock received for work is valued.
Main risk
Right of first offer (ROFO)The holder may decline a fair offer and lose the asset to a buyer who pays a little less.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)Outside buyers may not bid, knowing they can be matched.
Effect on liquidity
Right of first offer (ROFO)One round of offers, then the owner is free, within any price floor.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)Adds a waiting period to every deal and can thin out buyers.
Typical example
Right of first offer (ROFO)CRA International’s ROFO on three floors of the office building it rents.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)Astera Labs’ 30-day ROFR on employee shares, ending at its IPO.

A ROFO puts the owner’s price first. A ROFR puts the market’s price first and lets the holder take it

As of November 2026 · CRA International lease amendment (08.01.2024); Astera Labs equity plan (03.01.2024); 8 Del. C. §202; Treas. Reg. §1.83-3. US rules; terms vary by contract.

3.0How each works

How a ROFO and a ROFR Work, Step by Step

Right of First Offer

  1. OfferThe owner sends the holder its terms: what is for sale or rent, the price and the main conditions.
  2. DecisionThe holder has a set time to accept. Silence usually counts as a no.
  3. MarketIf the holder passes, the owner can deal with others. Some contracts bar a deal on clearly better terms without a new offer.

Right of First Refusal

  1. Outside dealThe owner agrees a price and terms with a buyer or tenant.
  2. NoticeThe owner sends the holder the deal: who, how much and on what terms.
  3. Match or passThe holder can step in on the same terms within the window. If it passes, the outside deal closes.

A third right, the right of first negotiation, is lighter still. It only requires talks before the owner goes to the market.

4.0Commercial leases

ROFR vs ROFO in a Commercial Lease

In an office or retail lease, these rights usually cover extra space. A growing tenant wants first claim on the floor above. The landlord wants to keep the building full at market rent.

CRA International shows how a ROFO works. Its 2024 lease amendment covers three floors of the office building it rents. When space there becomes available, the landlord must send an availability notice with the area, the rent and other terms. CRA then has ten business days to take all of it.

If CRA passes, the landlord can lease to someone else. There is a floor, though. If the new deal is worth less than 95% of the terms CRA was offered, the landlord must offer the space to CRA again. The right also ends in the last three years of the lease.

A ROFR in a lease works the other way. The landlord first signs terms with another tenant. The holder can then take the space on those same terms. A landlord may resist it, because prospective tenants may walk away once they learn they can be matched.

5.0Property sales

ROFR vs ROFO in Real Estate Sales

The same logic applies when a building or a piece of land is sold. A tenant, a co-owner or a neighbor may hold one of the rights.

  • With a ROFOThe owner names an asking price to the holder first. If the holder declines, the owner can sell to others, often within a price floor like CRA’s 95%.
  • With a ROFRThe owner signs a contract with a buyer, then gives the holder the chance to match it. The buyer’s deal can fall away at the last step.

Buyers price that risk in. They may spend less on research or bid lower when a ROFR hangs over the deal. A ROFO avoids this, because the holder’s turn comes before any buyer is involved.

6.0Which is better

ROFR vs ROFO: Which Is Better for Each Side?

For the holder, a ROFR is stronger. It sees the real market price before deciding. A ROFO forces a decision on the owner’s price, with no outside bid to compare.

For the owner, a ROFO is lighter. It runs one round of offers, then the owner is free to sell. Outside buyers are not put off, because no one can take their deal away.

For employees and other holders of private company stock, the company often holds a ROFR. That adds weeks to any secondary transaction. Under the NVCA model, a template from the National Venture Capital Association, the company has 15 days and investors 10 more.

7.0Tax

How the Tax Treatment Compares

Neither right creates a tax event by itself. Tax arises on the sale, at the price actually paid, whoever the buyer is.

For stock you receive for work, US rules value the shares while ignoring restrictions that will lapse. A nonlapse restriction, a permanent duty to sell at a formula price, is the exception. A permanent ROFR at a formula price counts as one. A duty to offer shares at fair market value does not.

8.0Pros and cons

ROFO vs ROFR Pros and Cons: A Verdict on Each

Right of First Offer

For
The owner sets the price and the timetable. Outside buyers are not chilled. The holder gets first look with clear rules.
Against
The holder decides without a market price to compare. If it declines, the asset may go to someone else for a little less.

Verdict: a ROFO suits an owner who wants to keep control of the sale. It also suits a holder that knows the asset well, such as a tenant pricing the floor above its own.

Right of First Refusal

For
The holder acts only at a price the market has set. It can keep the asset away from unwanted buyers.
Against
Every deal waits for the holder’s decision. Buyers may bid less, or not at all.

Verdict: a ROFR gives the holder the most protection and the owner the most friction. Private companies use it to control who owns their shares. Sellers pay for that control in time and in fewer buyers.

Key point

A ROFO asks the holder to answer the owner’s price. A ROFR lets the holder answer the market’s price.

9.0For you

What These Rights Mean for Your Shares or Lease

If you hold private shares, find the transfer rules in the bylaws, your stock plan or a separate agreement. Delaware law allows a company to require that shares be offered to it or to others first. The restriction binds you if it is noted on the certificate or in the share notice.

Startup ROFRs often end at the IPO, as Astera Labs’ did. After that, IPO lock-up agreements usually govern when you can sell.

Common Mistakes

  • Reading ROFO and ROFR as the sameA ROFO comes before any buyer. A ROFR comes after a buyer has agreed terms.
  • Missing the response windowCRA’s lease gives ten business days. Silence usually means you have declined.
  • Ignoring the price floorSome ROFOs let the owner sell to others only on terms close to the offer. Check the percentage.
  • Promising a buyer a fast closeA ROFR window, plus any investor turn, comes before your sale can close.
10.0Terms

The Terms This Page Uses

Right of first offer (ROFO)
A duty on the owner to offer an asset to one party first, on the owner’s own terms.
Right of first refusal (ROFR)
A right to buy or lease on the same terms an outside party has offered.
Right of first negotiation (ROFN)
A duty to negotiate with one party first, for a set period, before going to the market.
Availability notice
A landlord’s notice that space covered by a ROFO is free, with its terms.
Price floor
A limit on how far below the first offer the owner may go with someone else.
Nonlapse restriction
A permanent duty to sell at a formula price. US tax rules take it into account when valuing stock.
Transfer restriction
A rule in a company’s documents that limits how and to whom its shares can be sold.
Secondary transaction
A sale of existing shares from one holder to another.
11.0Questions

What People Ask About ROFOs and ROFRs

For protection, a ROFR. The tenant sees a real offer before deciding. A ROFO is easier to get from a landlord, because it does not chill other tenants.

It depends on the contract. Some ROFOs set a floor. In CRA’s lease, terms below 95% of the offer trigger a new offer to the tenant.

No. Under a ROFO, the owner makes an offer and the holder accepts or declines. Under a ROFN, the two sides only agree to negotiate first.

Usually, yes. They are written for private shares. Astera Labs’ plan says its ROFR terminates at the IPO.

Not by itself. Tax arises on the sale. A permanent ROFR at a formula price can affect how stock received for work is valued.

12.0Sources

Where Every Rule on This Page Comes From

Figures were last checked on November 6, 2026. Corporate law is Delaware law, and tax rules are United States federal rules. Each lease, plan and agreement sets its own binding terms.

  1. 01CRA International, Inc. (SEC EDGAR)08.01.2024Fifth Amendment to Lease: ROFO on three floors, ten business days to accept, re-offer below 95% of offered terms
  2. 02Astera Labs, Inc. (SEC EDGAR)03.01.20242018 Equity Incentive Plan: company ROFR, 30 days after notice, terminates at the IPO
  3. 03Delaware Code OnlineCurrent law8 Del. C. §202: transfer restrictions, prior opportunity to acquire, notice on the certificate
  4. 04Code of Federal Regulations (Cornell LII)Current ruleTreas. Reg. §1.83-3(h): nonlapse restrictions, ROFR at a formula price, offers at fair market value
  5. 05National Venture Capital Association04.2026Model Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement: company 15 days, investors 10 more

This page explains how a market works. It is not investment advice, not a recommendation of any security, strategy or company, and not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy anything. Private companies may never list or be acquired, positions in them can be illiquid for years, and the entire amount invested can be lost. Figures are accurate as of the dates shown and change. Requirements for investor status, and the tax treatment of a private holding, differ by jurisdiction — the jurisdiction is named wherever this page discusses either. Prepared by the AXEVIL Capital research team.

What closed on the private market in the past two weeks

The rounds that priced, the tender offers that opened and the listings that filed — with the structure of each deal and the date on every figure. Written by the team that reads the paperwork.

Once every two weeks. One email, no sales sequence, unsubscribe in one click. By subscribing you agree that Axevil Capital, LLC will process your email to send the newsletter, as described in the Privacy Policy. Read the published archive first if you like.
San Francisco548 Market St, San Francisco, California, 94104, United States
DubaiThe One Tower, 23rd Floor, Office 13, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
AstanaOffice 338, 55/23 Mangilik El Avenue, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Axevil Capital, LLC is a company (Delaware, #6832739) with legal address: 548 Market St, San Francisco, California, 94104, United States.

Axevil Capital, LLC has Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA) status (SEC #802−126907).

The information presented on the website is for informational purposes only and:
— does not constitute an offer to buy or sell securities or other financial instruments;
— does not constitute an invitation to trade or provision of investment services;
— does not constitute individual investment advice.

The Company works exclusively with qualified investors who possess the necessary knowledge, experience, and financial capacity to assess risks and invest in high-risk instruments. This asset class involves elevated risks, volatility, and illiquidity. Investors must be prepared to accept the possibility of total loss of invested capital as well as lack of liquidity.

NOTIFICATION OF INVESTMENT RISKS AND STATUS OF THE COMPANY'S ACTIVITIES

FOR ALL INVESTORS GENERALLY:
The Company's activities focus on attracting investments in mature venture projects at the stage of sustainable business development, close to IPO exit.
The Company does not guarantee profit generation. Investments involve risks, including the possibility of returns below expectations, which cannot be guaranteed.

NOTICE TO INVESTORS IN THE UNITED STATES:
— Investment interest offerings are conducted as private placements and are not subject to registration under US securities laws.
— Available only to accredited investors.
— Such securities may have transfer and resale restrictions.
— Investments carry a high level of financial risk.
— Independent legal, tax, and financial consultation is strongly recommended before making investment decisions.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE):
— Investment interest offerings are not public in the UAE.
— Directed only to qualified institutional investors.
— Interests are not registered or approved by the UAE Central Bank, SCA, or other regulators.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF ITALY:
— Interest offerings are not authorized by Italian regulators under Decreto Legislativo No. 58/1998.
— Interests may not be offered, distributed, or sold to the general public.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM:
— SPVs constitute unregulated collective investment schemes under FSMA 2000.
— Promotion is restricted and permitted only to "relevant persons" within the meaning of Financial Promotion Order 2005 (Articles 19(5), 49(2)(a)-(d)).
— Most standard protections of the UK regulatory system do not apply.
— Compensation under the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme is not provided.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF SWEDEN:
— The partnership is not an investment fund under the Swedish Investment Funds Act (2004:46).
— The offering is not subject to registration under the Swedish Financial Instruments Trading Act (1991:980).
— Interests are not approved and will not be approved by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF SWITZERLAND:
— SPVs are not approved by FINMA as foreign collective investment schemes under Article 120 CISA. Interests may not be publicly offered or distributed in Switzerland.
— SPVs are not regulated by Swiss authorities.
— Interests are available only to "qualified investors" under CISA or a limited circle of persons without public offering.
— By continuing, you confirm that:
1. You qualify as an accredited/qualified investor under the laws of your jurisdiction (e.g., in the U.S. an annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 jointly, or net worth above $1 million, excluding primary residence).
2. You are legally permitted to access this information in your jurisdiction.
3. You understand that private investments involve a high degree of risk, including the risk of total loss of capital.

Axevil Capital 2021−2026 — All Rights Reserved