Sequoia Thesis · Partner Briefing
Research Brief·Pre-IPO · AI Services·May 2026

Services: The New Software

Why the next trillion-dollar company will sell not software, but the work itself — and what that means for Axevil's deal flow.

Source: Julien Bek, Partner at Sequoia Capital. Essay "Services: The New Software," March 5, 2026. This briefing was prepared by Axevil Capital for internal and partner distribution.

$1 → $6For every $1 spent on software, businesses spend $6 on services
6×Larger TAM for autopilots than the SaaS market serving the same workers
70–80%Autopilot gross margin — service revenue at software-level margins
Main thesis

A software company disguised as a services firm.

The next $1 trillion company will be a software company disguised as a services firm. It won't sell a tool for professionals — it will sell the finished result of the work: closed books instead of an ERP, an issued policy instead of a brokerage platform, a finished NDA instead of lawyer access.

The economic lever is simple: the budget for the work itself, in any profession, is many times larger than the budget for tools. By capturing the labor budget instead of the software budget, an autopilot plays in a market 6x larger from day one.

Two types of companies

Copilot vs Autopilot.

One sells a tool. The other sells finished work. These are different business models and different bets for the decade ahead.

Copilot

Sells a tool

AI in the hands of a professional; the human decides how to use it and remains accountable for the result. A continuous dialogue between human and system.

Vulnerability: competes with every new model release; hands domain knowledge back to the human.

Harvey → law firmsRogo → investment banks
Autopilot

Sells the work

The client buys the finished result directly. The process is automated "like in aviation": a human monitors, takes over the hard parts, and stands ready to intervene.

Advantage: gets cheaper to run with every model improvement, instead of more vulnerable.

Crosby → NDAsWithCoverage → insurance
Bek's important clarification

"Autopilot" ≠ a full replacement of the human expert by AI. The analogy is an aircraft autopilot: most of the process is automated, but a human stays on standby and handles the hardest parts ("takeoff and landing").

Screening framework

Intelligence versus judgment.

What gets automated first, what stays with the human, and where the ideal autopilot target lives.

Gets automated

Intelligence

Complex but ultimately procedural tasks. Coding to spec, running tests, translating clinical notes into ICD-10 codes, screening resumes. The rules are complex — but they are rules. Automatable.

Stays with the human

Judgment

Experience, intuition, accountability. Stays with the human. The higher the share of judgment in a task, the slower autopilot wins.

Ideal autopilot target
high share of intelligence+a little judgment+already outsourced by result

Example: medical billing sounds like "medicine = judgment," but the coding layer is almost pure intelligence in a mature outsourcing market.

Opportunity map

TAM in the US labor market.

The largest verticals where autopilot competes not with the SaaS budget, but with the budget for the work itself.

Insurance brokerageIntelligence-dominant
$140–200B
Claims settlementIntelligence + judgment
$50–80B
Healthcare revenue cycleAlmost pure intelligence
$50–80B
Legal workDeals / paralegal / LPO
~$60B
Accounting / auditProcedural, tied to the outcome
Large

Bek maps roughly a dozen verticals with TAM estimates. Above are the largest and most-cited from the essay.

Moat and innovator's dilemma

Where the defensibility lives, and why the window is months, not years.

1.0

The moat is data, not the model

An accumulating dataset of domain decisions: what "good" means in brokerage or medical coding. Every completed task teaches the autopilot something a copilot never learns — because a copilot hands that knowledge back to the human.

2.0

The moat is trust

The window to become a trusted AI services firm in a vertical is measured in months, not years.

3.0

The 2025 copilot dilemma

They have a product and a customer, but selling the work means cutting their own customers out of the process. This is a window for pure 'day-one' autopilots (Rillet vs. Basis).

4.0

Unresolved

Go-to-market: enterprise services sales don't scale like software sales; margins are lower than pure SaaS (~70% versus ~90%) due to inference costs.

What this means for Axevil

A new class of pre-IPO assets — AI services.

One entry filter for deal flow, one watchlist for Market Intelligence.

Deal-flow filter

Screen any AI startup at intake with one question: does it capture the labor budget, or only the software budget? An autopilot in an already-outsourced vertical is a category for priority screening.

Watchlist for the Market Intelligence Portal — first-tier companies in each relevant vertical:

Related context: both OpenAI and Anthropic are building sales channels around PE firms; PE shops are betting on rolling up non-software businesses, making them AI-efficient, and reselling them at a higher price.

San Francisco548 Market St, San Francisco, California, 94104, United States
DubaiThe One Tower, 23rd Floor, Office 13, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
AstanaOffice 338, 55/23 Mangilik El Avenue, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Axevil Capital, LLC is a company (Delaware, #6832739) with legal address: 548 Market St, San Francisco, California, 94104, United States.

Axevil Capital, LLC has Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA) status (SEC #802−126907).

The information presented on the website is for informational purposes only and:
— does not constitute an offer to buy or sell securities or other financial instruments;
— does not constitute an invitation to trade or provision of investment services;
— does not constitute individual investment advice.

The Company works exclusively with qualified investors who possess the necessary knowledge, experience, and financial capacity to assess risks and invest in high-risk instruments. This asset class involves elevated risks, volatility, and illiquidity. Investors must be prepared to accept the possibility of total loss of invested capital as well as lack of liquidity.

NOTIFICATION OF INVESTMENT RISKS AND STATUS OF THE COMPANY'S ACTIVITIES

FOR ALL INVESTORS GENERALLY:
The Company's activities focus on attracting investments in mature venture projects at the stage of sustainable business development, close to IPO exit.
The Company does not guarantee profit generation. Investments involve risks, including the possibility of returns below expectations, which cannot be guaranteed.

NOTICE TO INVESTORS IN THE UNITED STATES:
— Investment interest offerings are conducted as private placements and are not subject to registration under US securities laws.
— Available only to accredited investors.
— Such securities may have transfer and resale restrictions.
— Investments carry a high level of financial risk.
— Independent legal, tax, and financial consultation is strongly recommended before making investment decisions.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE):
— Investment interest offerings are not public in the UAE.
— Directed only to qualified institutional investors.
— Interests are not registered or approved by the UAE Central Bank, SCA, or other regulators.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF ITALY:
— Interest offerings are not authorized by Italian regulators under Decreto Legislativo No. 58/1998.
— Interests may not be offered, distributed, or sold to the general public.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM:
— SPVs constitute unregulated collective investment schemes under FSMA 2000.
— Promotion is restricted and permitted only to "relevant persons" within the meaning of Financial Promotion Order 2005 (Articles 19(5), 49(2)(a)-(d)).
— Most standard protections of the UK regulatory system do not apply.
— Compensation under the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme is not provided.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF SWEDEN:
— The partnership is not an investment fund under the Swedish Investment Funds Act (2004:46).
— The offering is not subject to registration under the Swedish Financial Instruments Trading Act (1991:980).
— Interests are not approved and will not be approved by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF SWITZERLAND:
— SPVs are not approved by FINMA as foreign collective investment schemes under Article 120 CISA. Interests may not be publicly offered or distributed in Switzerland.
— SPVs are not regulated by Swiss authorities.
— Interests are available only to "qualified investors" under CISA or a limited circle of persons without public offering.
— By continuing, you confirm that:
1. You qualify as an accredited/qualified investor under the laws of your jurisdiction (e.g., in the U.S. an annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 jointly, or net worth above $1 million, excluding primary residence).
2. You are legally permitted to access this information in your jurisdiction.
3. You understand that private investments involve a high degree of risk, including the risk of total loss of capital.

Axevil Capital 2021−2026 — All Rights Reserved